[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201103203359.018184395@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:33:51 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 180/391] sgl_alloc_order: fix memory leak
From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
[ Upstream commit b2a182a40278bc5849730e66bca01a762188ed86 ]
sgl_alloc_order() can fail when 'length' is large on a memory
constrained system. When order > 0 it will potentially be
making several multi-page allocations with the later ones more
likely to fail than the earlier one. So it is important that
sgl_alloc_order() frees up any pages it has obtained before
returning NULL. In the case when order > 0 it calls the wrong
free page function and leaks. In testing the leak was
sufficient to bring down my 8 GiB laptop with OOM.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
lib/scatterlist.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
index 5d63a8857f361..c448642e0f786 100644
--- a/lib/scatterlist.c
+++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ struct scatterlist *sgl_alloc_order(unsigned long long length,
elem_len = min_t(u64, length, PAGE_SIZE << order);
page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
if (!page) {
- sgl_free(sgl);
+ sgl_free_order(sgl, order);
return NULL;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists