linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82dab98e-0761-8946-c31c-92f19a0615b4@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:53:53 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu
 api

On 11/2/20 7:52 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 02/11/2020 02:00, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Tvrtko,
>> On 10/12/20 4:44 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29/09/2020 01:11, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>> Hi Tvrtko,
>>>>
>>>> On 9/28/20 5:44 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27/09/2020 07:34, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The previous post of this series could be found here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200912032200.11489-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/ 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This version introduce a new patch [4/7] to fix an issue reported 
>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/51a1baec-48d1-c0ac-181b-1fba92aa428d@linux.intel.com/ 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There aren't any other changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please help to test and review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> baolu
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lu Baolu (3):
>>>>>>    iommu: Add quirk for Intel graphic devices in map_sg
>>>>>
>>>>> Since I do have patches to fix i915 to handle this, do we want to 
>>>>> co-ordinate the two and avoid having to add this quirk and then 
>>>>> later remove it? Or you want to go the staged approach?
>>>>
>>>> I have no preference. It depends on which patch goes first. Let the
>>>> maintainers help here.
>>>
>>> FYI we have merged the required i915 patches to out tree last week or 
>>> so. I *think* this means they will go into 5.11. So the i915 specific 
>>> workaround patch will not be needed in Intel IOMMU.
>>
>> Do you mind telling me what's the status of this fix patch? I tried this
>> series on v5.10-rc1 with the graphic quirk patch dropped. I am still
>> seeing dma faults from graphic device.
> 
> Hmm back then I thought i915 fixes for this would land in 5.11 so I will 
> stick with that. :) (See my quoted text a paragraph above yours.)

What size are those fixes? I am considering pushing this series for
v5.11. Is it possible to get some acks for those patches and let them
go to Linus through iommu tree?

Best regards,
baolu