[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKb7Uvhr8Cvd+kfw0Rcee-Nrtdg9y3JhGPeNsJjVEDcWXnVxxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:21:43 -0500
From: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"# 3.9+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/edid: Fix uninitialized variable in drm_cvt_modes()
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:15 PM Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Noticed this when trying to compile with -Wall on a kernel fork. We potentially
> don't set width here, which causes the compiler to complain about width
> potentially being uninitialized in drm_cvt_modes(). So, let's fix that.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Don't emit an error as this code isn't reachable, just mark it as such
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.9+
> Fixes: 3f649ab728cd ("treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage")
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 631125b46e04..0643b98c6383 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -3094,6 +3094,7 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
>
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> int width, height;
> + u8 cvt_aspect_ratio;
>
> cvt = &(timing->data.other_data.data.cvt[i]);
>
> @@ -3101,7 +3102,8 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
> continue;
>
> height = (cvt->code[0] + ((cvt->code[1] & 0xf0) << 4) + 1) * 2;
> - switch (cvt->code[1] & 0x0c) {
> + cvt_aspect_ratio = cvt->code[1] & 0x0c;
The temp var doesn't do anything now right? Previously you were using
it in the print, but now you can drop these two hunks, I think?
-ilia
> + switch (cvt_aspect_ratio) {
> case 0x00:
> width = height * 4 / 3;
> break;
> @@ -3114,6 +3116,8 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
> case 0x0c:
> width = height * 15 / 9;
> break;
> + default:
> + unreachable();
> }
>
> for (j = 1; j < 5; j++) {
> --
> 2.28.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists