linux-kernel - Re: Using fixed LPI number for some Device ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b26b16f3-777e-3f0d-8eac-5739764b387b@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 11:24:14 +0800
From:   Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Using fixed LPI number for some Device ID

On 2020/10/31 17:58, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 03:10:24 +0000,
> Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>   Sorry for the noise, Because Marc rarely uses the ARM email address,
>>   so I replace to use Marc's kernel.org address instead of ARM email address.
> Rarely is quite the understatement. I left ARM over a year ago, so the
> likelihood of me answering at this address in vanishingly small.

 Thanks for the clarification.

> 
> Maybe in a parallel universe? ;-)
> 
> 	M.
> 
> -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. .