linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clarify abstract scale usage for power values in Energy Model, EAS and IPA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af50b82f-015a-ad32-4e57-da3de9ac0a77@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:29:57 +0000
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To:     Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, amitk@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        dianders@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clarify abstract scale usage for power values in
 Energy Model, EAS and IPA



On 11/2/20 1:54 PM, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Monday 02 Nov 2020 at 08:54:38 (+0000), Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> Gentle ping to Quentin and Daniel for sharing opinion on this patch set.
>> If you are OK, then I could use this as a base for next work.
> 
> One or two small nits, but overall this LGTM. Thanks Lukasz.

Thank you Quentin for the review. I am going to send v4 with these small
changes.

Regards,
Lukasz

> 
>> As you probably know I am working also on 'sustainable power' estimation
>> which could be used when there is no DT value but it comes from FW.
>> That would meet requirement from Doug, when the DT cannot be used,
>> but we have sustainable levels from FW [1].
> 
> Cool, and also, I'd be happy to hear from Doug if passing the sustained
> power via sysfs is good enough for his use-case in the meantime?
> 
> Thanks,
> Quentin
>