[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcw8Hyaks9ZbRfz7HhBzPM2cJxR4ypye5PwcZqY9rsYhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:06:23 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@...il.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib: Convert test_printf.c to KUnit
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:54 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 04:40:49PM +0530, Arpitha Raghunandan wrote:
...
> > Better, indeed.
> >
> > But can be this improved to have a cumulative statistics, like showing only
> > number of total, succeeded, failed with details of the latter ones?
>
> Is that the proper test output format? We have a standard...
I dunno. I'm asking...
We have few possibilities here: a) let it go like above, b) use the
cumulative statistics, c) if there is no such available, implement and
use it, d) ...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists