lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcw8Hyaks9ZbRfz7HhBzPM2cJxR4ypye5PwcZqY9rsYhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:06:23 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@...il.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib: Convert test_printf.c to KUnit

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:54 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 04:40:49PM +0530, Arpitha Raghunandan wrote:

...

> > Better, indeed.
> >
> > But can be this improved to have a cumulative statistics, like showing only
> > number of total, succeeded, failed with details of the latter ones?
>
> Is that the proper test output format?  We have a standard...

I dunno. I'm asking...
We have few possibilities here: a) let it go like above, b) use the
cumulative statistics, c) if there is no such available, implement and
use it, d) ...

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ