lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:11:45 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        a.swigon@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
        Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        Seung Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        Bartłomiej Żołnierkiewicz 
        <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] PM / devfreq: exynos-bus: Add registration of
 interconnect child device

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 13:32, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> On 03.11.2020 11:45, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > On 10/30/20 9:51 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >> This patch adds registration of a child platform device for the exynos
> >> interconnect driver. It is assumed that the interconnect provider will
> >> only be needed when #interconnect-cells property is present in the bus
> >> DT node, hence the child device will be created only when such a property
> >> is present.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
>
> >>  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>
> > We don't need to  add 'select INTERCONNECT_EXYNOS' in Kconfig?
>
> I think by doing so we could run into some dependency issues.
>
> > Do you want to remain it as optional according to user?
> Yes, I would prefer to keep it selectable through defconfig.
> Currently it's only needed by one 32-bit ARM board.

I am fine with it as it is really optional.

You could consider then "imply" but then you would need to check for
dependencies (the same as with select).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ