linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 seccomp 5/5] seccomp/cache: Report cache data through /proc/pid/seccomp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202011041052.0D14CD6@keescook>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:57:03 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Dimitrios Skarlatos <dskarlat@...cmu.edu>,
        Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
        Hubertus Franke <frankeh@...ibm.com>,
        Jack Chen <jianyan2@...inois.edu>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Josep Torrellas <torrella@...inois.edu>,
        Tianyin Xu <tyxu@...inois.edu>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
        Valentin Rothberg <vrothber@...hat.com>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 seccomp 5/5] seccomp/cache: Report cache data through
 /proc/pid/seccomp_cache

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:40:51AM -0600, YiFei Zhu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6:29 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > Yeah, this is very interesting. That there is anything measurably _slower_
> > with the cache is surprising. Though with only 4 runs, I wonder if it's
> > still noisy? What happens at 10 runs -- more importantly what is the
> > standard deviation?
> 
> I could do that. it just takes such a long time. Each run takes about
> 20 minutes so with 10 runs per environment, 3 environments (native + 2
> docker) per boot, and 4 boots (2 bootparam * 2 compile config), it's
> 27 hours of compilation. I should probably script it at that point.

Yeah, I was facing the same issues. Though perhaps hackbench (with
multiple CPUs) would be a better test (and it's much faster):

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7723ae8d-8333-ba17-6983-a45ec8b11c54@redhat.com/

(I usually run this with a CNT of 20 to get quick results.)

> > I assume this is from Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier (IBPB) and
> > Single Threaded Indirect Branch Prediction (STIBP) (which get enabled
> > for threads under seccomp by default).
> >
> > Try booting with "spectre_v2_user=prctl"
> 
> Hmm, to make sure, boot with just "spectre_v2_user=prctl" on the
> command line and test the performance of that?

Right, see if that eliminates the 3 minute jump seen for seccomp.

-- 
Kees Cook