linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark LLVM as maintained rather than supported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdn77f-v4wj78YVxKhM4mgtuE++JtmORXAmfzK+xs7voJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:54:33 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark LLVM as maintained rather than supported

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:36 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:13 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
> Linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > Funding secured.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>
> Did you mix up the two? "Supported" is defined as "Someone is actually
> paid to look after this.", and it sounds like you are saying that this is now
> the case but wasn't earlier.

Ah, sorry, then please disregard this patch.  I kept seeing
"supporter" listed via get_maintainer.pl, and thought that was a lower
tier than maintainer.  I should have rechecked `S:` in MAINTAINERS:87
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers