[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vfd4nsXvDOtbq-2TTcKWzWdwDs28Qm4Kuqa-j7YOR-YbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 22:35:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 7/8] gpio: exar: switch to using regmap
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 9:34 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
...
> +static const struct regmap_config exar_regmap_config = {
> + .name = "exar-gpio",
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> +};
Looking at gpio-pca953xx regmap conversion I'm wondering shouldn't you
provide a callback to define volatile registers (such as GPIO input
bits)?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists