linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: ufs: Allow an error return value from ->device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:44:27 +0100
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: ufs: Allow an error return value from
 ->device_reset()

On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 16:14 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> It is simpler for drivers to provide a ->device_reset() callback
> irrespective of whether the GPIO, or firmware interface necessary to
> do the
> reset, is discovered during probe.
> 
> Change ->device_reset() to return an error code.  Drivers that
> provide
> the callback, but do not do the reset operation should return
> -EOPNOTSUPP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Bean huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>