[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73d4aff5c11424cf2f18735804a6cffccba07cad.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:44:27 +0100
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: ufs: Allow an error return value from
->device_reset()
On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 16:14 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> It is simpler for drivers to provide a ->device_reset() callback
> irrespective of whether the GPIO, or firmware interface necessary to
> do the
> reset, is discovered during probe.
>
> Change ->device_reset() to return an error code. Drivers that
> provide
> the callback, but do not do the reset operation should return
> -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Bean huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists