lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABJPP5AFd-i+haMCis7EUAht7hfRqB3sqCp34S=AUUsZ2aRjCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:20:29 +0530
From:   Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: improve email parsing

> I agree with them as well. Let us try to establish one common way from
> comments.
>
> Dwaipayan, if you code this into checkpatch.pl, maybe you can also add
> some hints on conventions for tags in the kernel (process) documentation
> to explain the rules and conventions we think make sense.
>

Sure, I will do that.
Maybe I will start afresh on this patch with all of the above views into
consideration. Once accepted, I will try to go for the documentation
part.

Thanks,
Dwaipayan.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ