[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABJPP5AFd-i+haMCis7EUAht7hfRqB3sqCp34S=AUUsZ2aRjCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:20:29 +0530
From: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: improve email parsing
> I agree with them as well. Let us try to establish one common way from
> comments.
>
> Dwaipayan, if you code this into checkpatch.pl, maybe you can also add
> some hints on conventions for tags in the kernel (process) documentation
> to explain the rules and conventions we think make sense.
>
Sure, I will do that.
Maybe I will start afresh on this patch with all of the above views into
consideration. Once accepted, I will try to go for the documentation
part.
Thanks,
Dwaipayan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists