[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201104095548.GU7761@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:55:48 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] clk: at91: clk-master: re-factor master clock
Hi,
On 04/11/2020 11:40:01+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9260.c b/drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9260.c
> index bb81ff731ad8..38d0141bcd2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9260.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9260.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ struct at91sam926x_data {
> bool has_slck;
> };
>
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(at91rm9200_mck_lock);
I guess this one should have a different name.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists