linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.10-rc2-rt4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201104104617.ueefmpdou4t3t2ce@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:46:17 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.10-rc2-rt4

On 2020-11-04 11:38:09 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 08:57:31PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I'm pleased to announce the v5.10-rc2-rt4 patch set.
> 
> All tests on passed in my lab. On arm64 and arm I saw slightly higher
> max latency values for signaltest and sigwaittest. Usually they are
> below 200us but currently I see up to 350us.

How reproducible are these numbers? If these numbers increase between
rt3 and rt4 then we have a hand full patches to look at.
 
> BTW, x86_64 also showed slightly higher numbers for signaltest for the
> v5.10-rc1-rt1 release. These are gone now.

just like that?

Sebastian