[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f4a83f2-3c9b-9549-0acf-057257b4255d@fivetechno.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:15:58 +0100
From: Markus Reichl <m.reichl@...etechno.de>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
dianders@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Assign a fixed index to mmc devices
on rk3399-roc-pc boards.
Hi Heiko,
Am 04.11.20 um 11:51 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Hi Markus,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2020, 10:49:45 CET schrieb Markus Reichl:
>> Recently introduced async probe on mmc devices can shuffle block IDs.
>> Pin them to fixed values to ease booting in evironments where UUIDs
>> are not practical. Use newly introduced aliases for mmcblk devices from [1].
>>
>> [1]
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11747669/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Reichl <m.reichl@...etechno.de>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi
>> index e7a459fa4322..bc9482b59428 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi
>> @@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ / {
>> model = "Firefly ROC-RK3399-PC Board";
>> compatible = "firefly,roc-rk3399-pc", "rockchip,rk3399";
>>
>> + aliases {
>> + mmc0 = &sdmmc;
>> + mmc1 = &sdhci;
>> + };
>> +
>
> Any reason for this odering?
Without pinning roc-pc mostly booted as
mmcblk0 = sdmmc = µSD
mmcblk1 = sdhci = eMMC
so I kept this behaviour in aliases
roc-pc-mezzanine with populated SDIO-M2-slot booted
mmc0 = sdio = (no mmcblk)
mmcblk1 = sdmmc = µSD
mmcblk2 = sdhci = eMMC
With my aliases both boards behave the same now and the optional SDIO slot
goes out of the way to mmc2.
>
> I.e. some previous incarnations had it ordered as (emmc, mmc, sdio).
> This is also true for the ChromeOS out-of-tree usage of those, the
> rk3399 dts in the chromeos-4.4 tree also orders this as sdhci, sdmmc, sdio.
The boards from my zoo (exynos, rk3399) mostly come up with SD-card as mmc0
and eMMC as mmc1 in mainline as opposed in some vendor kernels.
but I have no objection to set it the other way round if this is more common
with rk3399 boards.
>
> And I guess a further question would be when we're doing arbitary orderings
> anyway, why is this not in rk3399.dtsi ;-) ?
I restricted the ordering to the boards I have, not to confuse other established
use cases, but if a standard ordering is desired this can go to rk3399.dtsi.
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
Gruß,
--
Markus Reichl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists