[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201104124017.GW2620339@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:40:17 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>,
"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "Lu, Baolu" <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
"Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"jing.lin@...el.com" <jing.lin@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"netanelg@...lanox.com" <netanelg@...lanox.com>,
"shahafs@...lanox.com" <shahafs@...lanox.com>,
"yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com" <yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Ortiz, Samuel" <samuel.ortiz@...el.com>,
"Hossain, Mona" <mona.hossain@...el.com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/17] PCI: add SIOV and IMS capability detection
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:41:33AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 8:44 PM
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 02:49:27AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >
> > > > There is a missing hypercall to allow the guest to do this on its own,
> > > > presumably it will someday be fixed so IMS can work in guests.
> > >
> > > Hypercall is VMM specific, while IMS cap provides a VMM-agnostic
> > > interface so any guest driver (if following the spec) can seamlessly
> > > work on all hypervisors.
> >
> > It is a *VMM* issue, not PCI. Adding a PCI cap to describe a VMM issue
> > is architecturally wrong.
> >
> > IMS *can not work* in any hypervsior without some special
> > hypercall. Just block it in the platform code and forget about the PCI
> > cap.
> >
>
> It's per-device thing instead of platform thing. If the VMM understands
> the IMS format of a specific device and virtualize it to the guest,
Please no! Adding device specific emulation is just going down deeper
into this bad architecture.
Interrupts is a platform issue. Using emulation of MSI to dynamically
insert vectors to a VM was a reasonable, but hacky thing. Now it needs
proper platform support.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists