[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201104124746.74jdsig3dffomv3k@beryllium.lan>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:47:46 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.10-rc2-rt4
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:19:48PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Yes, Just fired up signaltest 5 times for arm64 and x86_64 with the
> latest release. Keep you posted.
arm64
1184 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 386.00
1185 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 417.00
1186 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 350.00
1187 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 360.00
1188 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 339.00
I noticed that also the last view 5.9-rt releases have higher values.
For example, version 5.9.0-rc8-rt12 has only 217us.
x86_64
1189 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 50.00
1190 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : pass 46.00
1191 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : pass 45.00
1192 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : pass 47.00
1193 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 52.00
Same thing for version 5.9.0-rc8-rt12, the max value was 40us.
I'll work on getting these reports more useful, the performance trend
seems to be an interesting metric.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists