linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: selftests: Factor code out of demand_paging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201104150017.GN20600@xz-x1>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:00:17 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: selftests: Factor code out of
 demand_paging_test

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:16:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> If you don't mind I'd like to try and cleanup / generalize / refactor
> demand_paging_test.c and dirty_log_test.c with a few patches first for
> you to base this work on. I can probably get something posted today
> or tomorrow.

Drew,

Would you consider picking up the two patches below in the dirty ring series if
you plan to rework the dirty log tests?  I got your r-b so I am making bold to
think I'm ok to ask this; I just want to avoid another potential conflict
within the series.

Thanks!

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20201023183358.50607-11-peterx@redhat.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20201023183358.50607-12-peterx@redhat.com/

-- 
Peter Xu