linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: ili210x: Enable suspend/resume functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:22:57 -0800
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: ili210x: Enable suspend/resume functions

Hi Adam,

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:15:47AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:34 AM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Some people may wish to wake their system from sleep, so this
> > patch enables a suspend and resume function which enables
> > and disables IRQ wake functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> 
> Gentle ping.  Any feedback on this?

Ah, sorry. This should not be needed as for I2C devices that are
configured as wakeup sources I2C core takes care of declaring interrupt
line as wake IRQ and should configure it accordingly during the system
state transitions.

See drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c - calls to
dev_pm_set_[dedicated_]wake_irq() in i2c_device_probe().

> 
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
> > index 199cf3daec10..9b1a61447054 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
> > @@ -474,6 +474,28 @@ static int ili210x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int __maybe_unused ili210x_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +       struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> > +
> > +       if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev))
> > +               enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused ili210x_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +       struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> > +
> > +       if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev))
> > +               disable_irq_wake(client->irq);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ili210x_i2c_pm, ili210x_i2c_suspend, ili210x_i2c_resume);
> > +
> >  static const struct i2c_device_id ili210x_i2c_id[] = {
> >         { "ili210x", (long)&ili210x_chip },
> >         { "ili2117", (long)&ili211x_chip },
> > @@ -495,6 +517,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ili210x_dt_ids);
> >  static struct i2c_driver ili210x_ts_driver = {
> >         .driver = {
> >                 .name = "ili210x_i2c",
> > +               .pm = &ili210x_i2c_pm,
> >                 .of_match_table = ili210x_dt_ids,
> >         },
> >         .id_table = ili210x_i2c_id,
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry