linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/9] bpf: Allow LSM programs to use bpf spin locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  4 Nov 2020 17:44:49 +0100
From:   KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/9] bpf: Allow LSM programs to use bpf spin locks

From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>

Usage of spin locks was not allowed for tracing programs due to
insufficient preemption checks. The verifier does not currently prevent
LSM programs from using spin locks, but the helpers are not exposed
via bpf_lsm_func_proto.

Based on the discussion in [1], non-sleepable LSM programs should be
able to use bpf_spin_{lock, unlock}.

Sleepable LSM programs can be preempted which means that allowng spin
locks will need more work (disabling preemption and the verifier
ensuring that no sleepable helpers are called when a spin lock is held).

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201103153132.2717326-1-kpsingh@chromium.org/T/#md601a053229287659071600d3483523f752cd2fb

Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c  |  4 ++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index 61f8cc52fd5b..93383df2140b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ bpf_lsm_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		return &bpf_task_storage_get_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_task_storage_delete:
 		return &bpf_task_storage_delete_proto;
+	case BPF_FUNC_spin_lock:
+		return &bpf_spin_lock_proto;
+	case BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock:
+		return &bpf_spin_unlock_proto;
 	default:
 		return tracing_prog_func_proto(func_id, prog);
 	}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 314018e8fc12..7c6c246077cf 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9739,6 +9739,23 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	if (map_value_has_spin_lock(map)) {
+		if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER) {
+			verbose(env, "socket filter progs cannot use bpf_spin_lock yet\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (is_tracing_prog_type(prog_type)) {
+			verbose(env, "tracing progs cannot use bpf_spin_lock yet\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (prog->aux->sleepable) {
+			verbose(env, "sleepable progs cannot use bpf_spin_lock yet\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if ((bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux) || bpf_map_is_dev_bound(map)) &&
 	    !bpf_offload_prog_map_match(prog, map)) {
 		verbose(env, "offload device mismatch between prog and map\n");
-- 
2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog