linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: selftests: Factor code out of demand_paging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANgfPd9RPiyX9BeYpWLHGyqfO83uWZKKynfP4vkbvSbzBK9syg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:01:47 -0800
From:   Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: selftests: Factor code out of demand_paging_test

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 7:28 AM Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:00:17AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:16:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > If you don't mind I'd like to try and cleanup / generalize / refactor
> > > demand_paging_test.c and dirty_log_test.c with a few patches first for
> > > you to base this work on. I can probably get something posted today
> > > or tomorrow.
> >
> > Drew,
> >
> > Would you consider picking up the two patches below in the dirty ring series if
> > you plan to rework the dirty log tests?  I got your r-b so I am making bold to
> > think I'm ok to ask this; I just want to avoid another potential conflict
> > within the series.
>
> Sure, no problem.
>
> I'll go ahead and get that cleanup / refactor series out.

Thanks Drew! I agree this will all be a lot cleaner when refactored
for multi-vcpu tests generally.

>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20201023183358.50607-11-peterx@redhat.com/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20201023183358.50607-12-peterx@redhat.com/
> >
> > --
> > Peter Xu
> >
>