lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 23:41:21 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@....com>,
        Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] libperf: Add libperf_evsel__mmap()

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:19:24AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

SNIP

> > > >
> > > > that maps page for each event, then perf_evsel__read
> > > > could go through the fast code, no?
> > >
> > > No, because we're not self-monitoring (pid == 0 and cpu == -1). With
> > > the following change:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> > > b/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> > > index eeca8203d73d..1fca9c121f7c 100644
> > > --- a/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> > > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static int test_stat_cpu(void)
> > >  {
> > >         struct perf_cpu_map *cpus;
> > >         struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> > > +       struct perf_event_mmap_page *pc;
> > >         struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> > >                 .type   = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
> > >                 .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK,
> > > @@ -32,6 +33,15 @@ static int test_stat_cpu(void)
> > >         err = perf_evsel__open(evsel, cpus, NULL);
> > >         __T("failed to open evsel", err == 0);
> > >
> > > +       pc = perf_evsel__mmap(evsel, 0);
> > > +       __T("failed to mmap evsel", pc);
> > > +
> > > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> > > +       __T("userspace counter access not supported", pc->cap_user_rdpmc);
> > > +       __T("userspace counter access not enabled", pc->index);
> > > +       __T("userspace counter width not set", pc->pmc_width >= 32);
> > > +#endif
> >
> > I'll need to check, I'm surprised this would depend on the way
> > you open the event
> 
> Any more thoughts on this?

sry I got stuck with other stuff.. I tried your change
and pc->cap_user_rdpmc is 0 because the test creates
software event, which does not support that

when I change that to:

	.type   = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
	.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,

I don't see any of those warning you added

jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ