lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjd-jLMYaQoSz5+US0fEYCu2rLh4vn8X_WJu807k++DAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:54:05 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kunit fixes update for Linux 5.10-rc3

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:01 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Oops. I don't usually miss adding [GIT PULL] - will pay more attention.

No problem. As mentioned, my own workflow doesn't actually care as
long as the body of the mail has that "please pull" and "git"
mentioned.

And I wouldn't have noticed the pr-tracker-bot reply missing either,
if it wasn't for the fact that I replied to the pull request for other
reasons..

So no worries, just a note on how that "[GIT PULL]" marker might be
helpful for _you_ to see "oh, Linus pulled it, I can forget about it".

            Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ