linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Update verification logic for LSM programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201105230221.2620663-1-kpsingh@chromium.org>
Date:   Thu,  5 Nov 2020 23:02:21 +0000
From:   KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Update verification logic for LSM programs

From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>

The current logic checks if the name of the BTF type passed in
attach_btf_id starts with "bpf_lsm_", this is not sufficient as it also
allows attachment to non-LSM hooks like the very function that performs
this check, i.e. bpf_lsm_verify_prog.

In order to ensure that this verification logic allows attachment to
only LSM hooks, the LSM_HOOK definitions in lsm_hook_defs.h are used to
generate a BTD id set. The attach_btf_id of the program being attached
is then checked for presence in this set.

Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index 78ea8a7bd27f..56cc5a915f67 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
 #include <net/bpf_sk_storage.h>
 #include <linux/bpf_local_storage.h>
+#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
 
 /* For every LSM hook that allows attachment of BPF programs, declare a nop
  * function where a BPF program can be attached.
@@ -26,7 +27,11 @@ noinline RET bpf_lsm_##NAME(__VA_ARGS__)	\
 #include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
 #undef LSM_HOOK
 
-#define BPF_LSM_SYM_PREFX  "bpf_lsm_"
+#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_##NAME)
+BTF_SET_START(bpf_lsm_hooks)
+#include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
+#undef LSM_HOOK
+BTF_SET_END(bpf_lsm_hooks)
 
 int bpf_lsm_verify_prog(struct bpf_verifier_log *vlog,
 			const struct bpf_prog *prog)
@@ -37,8 +42,7 @@ int bpf_lsm_verify_prog(struct bpf_verifier_log *vlog,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (strncmp(BPF_LSM_SYM_PREFX, prog->aux->attach_func_name,
-		    sizeof(BPF_LSM_SYM_PREFX) - 1)) {
+	if (!btf_id_set_contains(&bpf_lsm_hooks, prog->aux->attach_btf_id)) {
 		bpf_log(vlog, "attach_btf_id %u points to wrong type name %s\n",
 			prog->aux->attach_btf_id, prog->aux->attach_func_name);
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog