linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/16] rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201105230921.19017-13-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu,  5 Nov 2020 15:09:18 -0800
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/16] rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header comment

From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>

This commit fixes a typo in the rcu_blocking_is_gp() function's header
comment.

Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index e790b85..e825b3b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3572,7 +3572,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
  * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
  * implies a grace period.  Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION.
  *
- * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
+ * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
  * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
  * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
  * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited().  It is OK to
-- 
2.9.5