lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201105230921.19017-2-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu,  5 Nov 2020 15:09:07 -0800
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/16] x86/smpboot:  Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>

The call to rcu_cpu_starting() in mtrr_ap_init() is not early enough
in the CPU-hotplug onlining process, which results in lockdep splats
as follows:

=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.9.0+ #268 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kernel/kprobes.c:300 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

other info that might help us debug this:

RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by swapper/1/0.

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.9.0+ #268
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x77/0x97
 __is_insn_slot_addr+0x15d/0x170
 kernel_text_address+0xba/0xe0
 ? get_stack_info+0x22/0xa0
 __kernel_text_address+0x9/0x30
 show_trace_log_lvl+0x17d/0x380
 ? dump_stack+0x77/0x97
 dump_stack+0x77/0x97
 __lock_acquire+0xdf7/0x1bf0
 lock_acquire+0x258/0x3d0
 ? vprintk_emit+0x6d/0x2c0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x27/0x40
 ? vprintk_emit+0x6d/0x2c0
 vprintk_emit+0x6d/0x2c0
 printk+0x4d/0x69
 start_secondary+0x1c/0x100
 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb8/0xbb

This is avoided by moving the call to rcu_cpu_starting up near
the beginning of the start_secondary() function.  Note that the
raw_smp_processor_id() is required in order to avoid calling into lockdep
before RCU has declared the CPU to be watched for readers.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/160223032121.7002.1269740091547117869.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c | 2 --
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c       | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
index 6a80f36..5f436cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
@@ -794,8 +794,6 @@ void mtrr_ap_init(void)
 	if (!use_intel() || mtrr_aps_delayed_init)
 		return;
 
-	rcu_cpu_starting(smp_processor_id());
-
 	/*
 	 * Ideally we should hold mtrr_mutex here to avoid mtrr entries
 	 * changed, but this routine will be called in cpu boot time,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index de776b2..99bdceb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ static void notrace start_secondary(void *unused)
 #endif
 	cpu_init_exception_handling();
 	cpu_init();
+	rcu_cpu_starting(raw_smp_processor_id());
 	x86_cpuinit.early_percpu_clock_init();
 	preempt_disable();
 	smp_callin();
-- 
2.9.5

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ