[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d86b24aa-2887-0e29-2221-925acef77f8d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 18:12:20 -0500
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Gabriel Marin <gmx@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: Invoke pmu::sched_task callback for per-cpu
events
On 11/5/2020 4:15 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:40 AM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/5/2020 10:54 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>> -void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu)
>>>> +void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu, bool systemwide)
>>>> {
>>>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
>>>>
>>>> - if (!cpuctx->sched_cb_usage++)
>>>> - list_add(&cpuctx->sched_cb_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list));
>>>> + cpuctx->sched_cb_usage++;
>>>>
>>>> - this_cpu_inc(perf_sched_cb_usages);
>>>> + if (systemwide) {
>>>> + this_cpu_inc(perf_sched_cb_usages);
>>>> + list_add(&cpuctx->sched_cb_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list));
>>> You need to check the value and make sure it's added only once.
>>
>> Right, maybe we have to add a new variable for that.
>>
> Sure, I tend to agree here that we need a narrower scope trigger, only
> when needed, i.e., an event
> or PMU feature that requires ctxsw work. In fact, I am also interested
> in splitting ctxswin and ctswout
> callbacks. The reason is that you have overhead in the way the
> callback is invoked. You may end up
> calling the sched_task on ctxswout when only ctxwin is needed. In
> doing that you pay the cost of
> stopping/starting the PMU for possibly nothing. Stopping the PMU can
> be expensive, like on AMD
> where you need multiple wrmsr.
>
> So splitting or adding a flag to convey that either CTXSW_IN or
> CTXSW_OUT is needed would help.
> I am suggesting this now given you are adding a flag.
>
Yes, adding a new flag would avoid the unnecessary PMU stop/restart for
both per-cpu and per-process event.
How about the patch as below?
(Just did simple test. Should need another patch to split the callback.)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 6586f7e71cfb..e5837fdf82e3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_reset(void)
static void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+ int state = PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_IN;
if (!ppmu->bhrb_nr)
return;
@@ -380,7 +381,11 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event
*event)
cpuhw->bhrb_context = event->ctx;
}
cpuhw->bhrb_users++;
- perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu);
+
+ if (!(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK))
+ state |= PERF_SCHED_CB_CPU;
+
+ perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu, state);
}
static void power_pmu_bhrb_disable(struct perf_event *event)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 444e5f061d04..f4f9d737ca85 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -1019,12 +1019,16 @@ pebs_update_state(bool needed_cb, struct
cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
* that does not hurt:
*/
bool update = cpuc->n_pebs == 1;
+ int state = PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_OUT;
if (needed_cb != pebs_needs_sched_cb(cpuc)) {
+ if (!(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK))
+ state |= PERF_SCHED_CB_CPU;
+
if (!needed_cb)
- perf_sched_cb_inc(pmu);
+ perf_sched_cb_inc(pmu, state);
else
- perf_sched_cb_dec(pmu);
+ perf_sched_cb_dec(pmu, state);
update = true;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 8961653c5dd2..e4c500580df5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -660,6 +660,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache = event->pmu->task_ctx_cache;
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+ int state = PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_IN;
if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
return;
@@ -693,7 +694,13 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
*/
if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline && event->attr.precise_ip > 0)
cpuc->lbr_pebs_users++;
- perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu);
+
+ if (!(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK))
+ state |= PERF_SCHED_CB_CPU;
+ if (event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA)
+ state |= PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_OUT;
+
+ perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu, state);
if (!cpuc->lbr_users++ && !event->total_time_running)
intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
@@ -724,6 +731,7 @@ void release_lbr_buffers(void)
void intel_pmu_lbr_del(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+ int state = 0;
if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
return;
@@ -740,7 +748,10 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_del(struct perf_event *event)
cpuc->lbr_users--;
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->lbr_users < 0);
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->lbr_pebs_users < 0);
- perf_sched_cb_dec(event->ctx->pmu);
+
+ if (!(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK))
+ state |= PERF_SCHED_CB_CPU;
+ perf_sched_cb_dec(event->ctx->pmu, state);
}
static inline bool vlbr_exclude_host(void)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index a1b91f2de264..1556fdbfc615 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -854,6 +854,10 @@ struct perf_event_context {
*/
#define PERF_NR_CONTEXTS 4
+#define PERF_SCHED_CB_CPU 0x1
+#define PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_IN 0x2
+#define PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_OUT 0x4
+
/**
* struct perf_event_cpu_context - per cpu event context structure
*/
@@ -875,6 +879,8 @@ struct perf_cpu_context {
struct list_head sched_cb_entry;
int sched_cb_usage;
+ int sched_cb_cpu_usage;
+ int sched_cb_state;
int online;
/*
@@ -967,8 +973,8 @@ extern const struct perf_event_attr
*perf_event_attrs(struct perf_event *event);
extern void perf_event_print_debug(void);
extern void perf_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu);
extern void perf_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu);
-extern void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu);
-extern void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu);
+extern void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu, int state);
+extern void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu, int state);
extern int perf_event_task_disable(void);
extern int perf_event_task_enable(void);
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 66a9bd71f3da..3a9d017a75b6 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3384,6 +3384,34 @@ static void perf_event_sync_stat(struct
perf_event_context *ctx,
}
}
+static inline bool perf_pmu_sched_in_ctx(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
+{
+ return !!(cpuctx->sched_cb_state & PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_IN);
+}
+
+static inline bool perf_pmu_sched_out_ctx(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
+{
+ return !!(cpuctx->sched_cb_state & PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_OUT);
+}
+
+static inline bool perf_pmu_has_sched_task(struct perf_cpu_context
*cpuctx, bool sched_in)
+{
+ struct pmu *pmu;
+
+ pmu = cpuctx->ctx.pmu; /* software PMUs will not have sched_task */
+
+ if (!pmu->sched_task)
+ return false;
+
+ if (sched_in && perf_pmu_sched_in_ctx(cpuctx))
+ return true;
+
+ if (!sched_in && perf_pmu_sched_out_ctx(cpuctx))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int
ctxn,
struct task_struct *next)
{
@@ -3433,7 +3461,7 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct
task_struct *task, int ctxn,
perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
- if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage && pmu->sched_task)
+ if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage && perf_pmu_has_sched_task(cpuctx, false))
pmu->sched_task(ctx, false);
/*
@@ -3473,7 +3501,7 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct
task_struct *task, int ctxn,
raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
- if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage && pmu->sched_task)
+ if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage && perf_pmu_has_sched_task(cpuctx, false))
pmu->sched_task(ctx, false);
task_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx, EVENT_ALL);
@@ -3484,22 +3512,35 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct
task_struct *task, int ctxn,
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, sched_cb_list);
-void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu)
+void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu, int state)
{
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
+ if (!--cpuctx->sched_cb_usage)
+ cpuctx->sched_cb_state = 0;
+
+ if (!(state & PERF_SCHED_CB_CPU))
+ return;
+
this_cpu_dec(perf_sched_cb_usages);
- if (!--cpuctx->sched_cb_usage)
+ if (!--cpuctx->sched_cb_cpu_usage)
list_del(&cpuctx->sched_cb_entry);
}
-void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu)
+void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu, int state)
{
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
- if (!cpuctx->sched_cb_usage++)
+ cpuctx->sched_cb_usage++;
+
+ cpuctx->sched_cb_state |= state;
+
+ if (!(state & PERF_SCHED_CB_CPU))
+ return;
+
+ if (!cpuctx->sched_cb_cpu_usage++)
list_add(&cpuctx->sched_cb_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list));
this_cpu_inc(perf_sched_cb_usages);
@@ -3544,8 +3585,8 @@ static void perf_pmu_sched_task(struct task_struct
*prev,
/* will be handled in perf_event_context_sched_in/out */
if (cpuctx->task_ctx)
continue;
-
- __perf_pmu_sched_task(cpuctx, sched_in);
+ if (perf_pmu_has_sched_task(cpuctx, sched_in))
+ __perf_pmu_sched_task(cpuctx, sched_in);
}
}
@@ -3809,7 +3850,8 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct
perf_event_context *ctx,
cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
if (cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx) {
- if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage)
+ if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage &&
+ (cpuctx->sched_cb_state & PERF_SCHED_CB_SW_IN))
__perf_pmu_sched_task(cpuctx, true);
return;
}
@@ -3835,7 +3877,7 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct
perf_event_context *ctx,
cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, task);
- if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage && pmu->sched_task)
+ if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage && perf_pmu_has_sched_task(cpuctx, true))
pmu->sched_task(cpuctx->task_ctx, true);
perf_pmu_enable(pmu);
Thanks,
Kan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists