[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201105232454.19919-7-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:24:54 -0800
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/7] rcu: Prevent RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() from swallowing the condition
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
We run into a unused variable warning in bridge code when variable is
only used inside the condition of rcu_dereference_protected().
#define mlock_dereference(X, br) \
rcu_dereference_protected(X, lockdep_is_held(&br->multicast_lock))
Since on builds with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=n rcu_dereference_protected()
compiles to nothing the compiler doesn't see the variable use.
This commit therefore prevents this warning by adding the condition as
dead code.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
--
CC: paulmck@...nel.org
CC: josh@...htriplett.org
CC: rostedt@...dmis.org
CC: mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
CC: joel@...lfernandes.org
CC: jiangshanlai@...il.com
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index f9533bb..de08264 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
-#define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s) do { } while (0)
+#define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s) do { } while (0 && (c))
#define rcu_sleep_check() do { } while (0)
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists