| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:23:37 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
mturquette@...libre.com, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Naveen Yadav <naveenky@...eaurora.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: Add SDX55 GCC support
Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2020-10-28 00:42:30)
> From: Naveen Yadav <naveenky@...eaurora.org>
>
> Add Global Clock Controller (GCC) support for SDX55 SoCs from Qualcomm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Yadav <naveenky@...eaurora.org>
> [mani: converted to parent_data, commented critical clocks, cleanups]
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdx55.c | 1667 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 1676 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdx55.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> index 3a965bd326d5..dbca8debc06f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> @@ -502,4 +502,12 @@ config KRAITCC
> Support for the Krait CPU clocks on Qualcomm devices.
> Say Y if you want to support CPU frequency scaling.
>
> +config GCC_SDX55
Please sort instead of add at end.
> + tristate "SDX55 Global Clock Controller"
> + depends on ARM
Why?
> + help
> + Support for the global clock controller on SDX55 devices.
> + Say Y if you want to use peripheral devices such as UART,
> + SPI, I2C, USB, SD/UFS, PCIe etc.
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> index 11ae86febe87..3e27d67f95aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -75,3 +75,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_PMIC_CLKDIV) += clk-spmi-pmic-div.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KPSS_XCC) += kpss-xcc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_HFPLL) += hfpll.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KRAITCC) += krait-cc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GCC_SDX55) += gcc-sdx55.o
Please sort this instead of add at end.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdx55.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdx55.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..75831c829202
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdx55.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1667 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018-2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2020, Linaro Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.h>
> +
> +#include "common.h"
> +#include "clk-alpha-pll.h"
> +#include "clk-branch.h"
> +#include "clk-pll.h"
> +#include "clk-rcg.h"
> +#include "clk-regmap.h"
> +#include "reset.h"
> +
> +enum {
> + P_BI_TCXO,
> + P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE,
> + P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN,
> + P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN,
> + P_GPLL4_OUT_EVEN,
> + P_GPLL5_OUT_MAIN,
> + P_SLEEP_CLK,
> +};
> +
> +static struct pll_vco lucid_vco[] = {
const
> + { 249600000, 2000000000, 0 },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_alpha_pll gpll0 = {
> + .offset = 0x0,
> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_LUCID],
> + .vco_table = lucid_vco,
> + .num_vco = ARRAY_SIZE(lucid_vco),
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x6d000,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll0",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> + .fw_name = "bi_tcxo",
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_fixed_lucid_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_div_table post_div_table_lucid_even[] = {
> + { 0x0, 1 },
> + { 0x1, 2 },
> + { 0x3, 4 },
> + { 0x7, 8 },
> + { }
> +};
I think this table is common to all lucid plls? Maybe we can push it
into the clk_ops somehow and stop duplicating it here?
> +
> +static struct clk_alpha_pll_postdiv gpll0_out_even = {
> + .offset = 0x0,
> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_LUCID],
> + .post_div_shift = 8,
> + .post_div_table = post_div_table_lucid_even,
> + .num_post_div = ARRAY_SIZE(post_div_table_lucid_even),
> + .width = 4,
> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll0_out_even",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> + .fw_name = "gpll0",
> + },
If this is gpll0 in this file, then this should be a clk_hws pointer
instead and directly pointing to the parent.
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_lucid_ops,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_alpha_pll gpll4 = {
> + .offset = 0x76000,
> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_LUCID],
> + .vco_table = lucid_vco,
> + .num_vco = ARRAY_SIZE(lucid_vco),
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x6d000,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(4),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll4",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> + .fw_name = "bi_tcxo",
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_fixed_lucid_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_alpha_pll_postdiv gpll4_out_even = {
> + .offset = 0x76000,
> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_LUCID],
> + .post_div_shift = 8,
> + .post_div_table = post_div_table_lucid_even,
> + .num_post_div = ARRAY_SIZE(post_div_table_lucid_even),
> + .width = 4,
> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll4_out_even",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> + .fw_name = "gpll4",
If this is gpll4 in this file, then this should be a clk_hws pointer
instead and directly pointing to the parent.
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_lucid_ops,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_alpha_pll gpll5 = {
> + .offset = 0x74000,
> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_LUCID],
> + .vco_table = lucid_vco,
> + .num_vco = ARRAY_SIZE(lucid_vco),
[...]
> + .name = "gcc_sdcc1_ahb_clk",
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_sdcc1_apps_clk = {
> + .halt_reg = 0xf004,
> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0xf004,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_sdcc1_apps_clk",
> + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]){
> + &gcc_sdcc1_apps_clk_src.clkr.hw },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +/* For CPUSS functionality the SYS NOC clock needs to be left enabled */
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_sys_noc_cpuss_ahb_clk = {
> + .halt_reg = 0x4010,
> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_VOTED,
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x6d008,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_sys_noc_cpuss_ahb_clk",
> + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]){
> + &gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src.clkr.hw },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
These CLK_IS_CRITICAL clks can't be set once at driver probe time and
forgotten about? It would be nice to not allocate memory for things that
never matter.
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_usb30_master_clk = {
> + .halt_reg = 0xb010,
> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0xb010,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_usb30_master_clk",
> + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]){
> + &gcc_usb30_master_clk_src.clkr.hw },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
[...]
> +
> +static const struct qcom_cc_desc gcc_sdx55_desc = {
> + .config = &gcc_sdx55_regmap_config,
> + .clks = gcc_sdx55_clocks,
> + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_sdx55_clocks),
> + .resets = gcc_sdx55_resets,
> + .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_sdx55_resets),
No gdscs?
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id gcc_sdx55_match_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,gcc-sdx55" },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gcc_sdx55_match_table);
> +
> +static int gcc_sdx55_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + return qcom_cc_probe(pdev, &gcc_sdx55_desc);
Wow haven't seen this in some time. There isn't some sort of PLL that
needs configuring or some clks that need to be slammed on with a couple
register writes?
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists