linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/1] x86: deduplicate the spectre_v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201105001406.13005-1-aarcange@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed,  4 Nov 2020 19:14:05 -0500
From:   Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@...il.com>,
        Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Dimitrios Skarlatos <dskarlat@...cmu.edu>,
        Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
        Hubertus Franke <frankeh@...ibm.com>,
        Jack Chen <jianyan2@...inois.edu>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Josep Torrellas <torrella@...inois.edu>,
        Tianyin Xu <tyxu@...inois.edu>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
        Valentin Rothberg <vrothber@...hat.com>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] x86: deduplicate the spectre_v2_user documentation

Hello,

Could you help checking if this incremental doc cleanup is possible?

After the previous patch is applied, there's still a leftover mention
of seccomp that should be removed in a duped bit of documentation, so
I tentatively referred the original documentation already updated in
sync, instead of keeping the dup around and applying the same update
to the dup.

Note: as far as I can tell spec_store_bypass_disable= documentation is
not duplicated in spectre.rst, that's better in my view. The more dups
we have the more one goes out of sync..

Andrea Arcangeli (1):
  x86: deduplicate the spectre_v2_user documentation

 Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst | 51 +------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)