linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:58:45 +0000
From:   "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        "mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF


On Thu, 2020-11-05 at 08:23 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > 
> > > Add core support for ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs which are
> > > mainly used to power the R-Car series processors.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com
> > > >
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig              |  11 +++
> > >  drivers/mfd/Makefile             |   1 +
> > >  drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c        | 130
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h  |  59 ++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h |   2 +
> > >  5 files changed, 203 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
> > >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > +static const struct regmap_range volatile_ranges[] = {
> > > +	{
> > > +		.range_min = BD957X_REG_SMRB_ASSERT,
> > > +		.range_max = BD957X_REG_SMRB_ASSERT,
> > > +	},
> > > +	{
> > 
> > The way you space your braces is not consistent.
> > 
> > > +		.range_min = BD957X_REG_PMIC_INTERNAL_STAT,
> > > +		.range_max = BD957X_REG_PMIC_INTERNAL_STAT,
> > > +	},
> > > +	{
> > > +		.range_min = BD957X_REG_INT_THERM_STAT,
> > > +		.range_max = BD957X_REG_INT_THERM_STAT,
> > > +	},
> > > +	{
> > > +		.range_min = BD957X_REG_INT_OVP_STAT,
> > > +		.range_max = BD957X_REG_INT_SYS_STAT,
> > > +	}, {
> > > +		.range_min = BD957X_REG_INT_MAIN_STAT,
> > > +		.range_max = BD957X_REG_INT_MAIN_STAT,
> > > +	},
> > > +};
> 
> Don't forget about this.
> 
> I would prefer to have the braces on the same line (even if it means
> you have to change an extra line when editing), but I'm not 100% dead
> set on it.  Consistency however, I am.
> 

I won't forget. I intended to write that I was Ok with all the other
comments. Maybe I forgot though. Anyways, I'll fix the inconsistency -
thanks for pointing it out!

--Matti