[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201105100520.GI4488@dell>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:05:20 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/36] tty: synclinkmp: Mark never checked 'readval' as
__always_unused
On Thu, 05 Nov 2020, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 01:39:36AM -0800, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Nov 5, 2020, at 1:10 AM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, let the loop alone. I would bet a half a pig that noone is able to test this driver. But one has to write this for someone to raise and admit they are still using it. In fact, there are _4_ google replies to "Microgate Corporation" "SyncLink Multiport Adapter" "lspci".
> >
> >
> >
> > The hardware used with synclink.c and synclinkmp.c has not been
> manufactured for 15 years and was low volume. The chances of either
> driver still being in use is very low. Not even Microgate (me) has
> the ability to test either anymore (no hardware). I don’t know the
> policy about driver removal, but I think both could be removed
> without upsetting anyone.
> >
> > synclink_gt.c is still in production and the driver still actively used.
> >
> > If there are no objections to removing the the old drivers
> > (synclink.c/synclink_mp.c) I could make a patch to do so tomorrow
> > (it is 1:30am here now). Nothing eliminates niggling warnings like
> > removing dead code.
>
> Great, please submit a patch to remove these, I will always take patches
> to delete lines :)
Good resolution. I'm happy to do this. Bear with me.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists