linux-kernel - Re: Regression: QCA6390 fails with "mm/page_alloc: place pages to tail in __free_pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:42:33 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Pavel Procopiuc <pavel.procopiuc@...il.com>, david@...hat.com
Cc:     ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression: QCA6390 fails with "mm/page_alloc: place pages to
 tail in __free_pages_core()"

On 11/5/20 10:04 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (changing the subject, adding more lists and people)
> 
> Pavel Procopiuc <pavel.procopiuc@...il.com> writes:
> 
>> Op 04.11.2020 om 10:12 schreef Kalle Valo:
>>> Yeah, it is unfortunately time consuming but it is the best way to get
>>> bottom of this.
>>
>> I have found the commit that breaks things for me, it's
>> 7fef431be9c9ac255838a9578331567b9dba4477 mm/page_alloc: place pages to
>> tail in __free_pages_core()
>>
>> I've reverted it on top of the 5.10-rc2 and ath11k driver loads fine
>> and I have wifi working.
> 
> Oh, very interesting. Thanks a lot for the bisection, otherwise we would
> have never found out whats causing this.
> 
> David & mm folks: Pavel noticed that his QCA6390 Wi-Fi 6 device (driver
> ath11k) failed on v5.10-rc1. After bisecting he found that the commit
> below causes the regression. I have not been able to reproduce this and
> for me QCA6390 works fine. I don't know if this needs a specific kernel
> configuration or what's the difference between our setups.
> 
> Any ideas what might cause this and how to fix it?
> 
> Full discussion: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath11k/2020-November/000501.html
> 
> commit 7fef431be9c9ac255838a9578331567b9dba4477
> Author:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu Oct 15 20:09:35 2020 -0700
> Commit:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> CommitDate: Fri Oct 16 11:11:18 2020 -0700
> 
>      mm/page_alloc: place pages to tail in __free_pages_core()
> 

Let me paste from the ath11k discussion:

> * Relevant errors from the log:
> # journalctl -b | grep -iP '05:00|ath11k'
> Nov 02 10:41:26 razor kernel: pci 0000:05:00.0: [17cb:1101] type 00 class 0x028000
> Nov 02 10:41:26 razor kernel: pci 0000:05:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xd2100000-0xd21fffff 64bit]
> Nov 02 10:41:26 razor kernel: pci 0000:05:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> Nov 02 10:41:26 razor kernel: pci 0000:05:00.0: 4.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 5.0 GT/s PCIe x1 link at 
> 0000:00:1c.1 (capable of 7.876 Gb/s with 8.0 GT/s PCIe x1 link)
> Nov 02 10:41:26 razor kernel: pci 0000:05:00.0: Adding to iommu group 21
> Nov 02 10:41:27 razor kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: WARNING: ath11k PCI support is experimental!
> Nov 02 10:41:27 razor kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xd2100000-0xd21fffff 64bit]
> Nov 02 10:41:27 razor kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> Nov 02 10:41:27 razor kernel: mhi 0000:05:00.0: Requested to power ON
> Nov 02 10:41:27 razor kernel: mhi 0000:05:00.0: Power on setup success
> Nov 02 10:41:27 razor kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: Respond mem req failed, result: 1, err: 0

This seems to be ath11k_qmi_respond_fw_mem_request(). Why is it failure with 
error 0? No idea.

What would happen if all the GFP_KERNEL in the file were changed to GFP_DMA32?

I'm thinking the hardware perhaps doesn't like too high physical addresses or 
something. But if I think correctly, freeing to tail should actually move them 
towards head. So it's weird.

> Nov 02 10:41:27 razor kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: qmi failed to respond fw mem req:-22
> Nov 02 10:41:32 razor kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: qmi failed memory request, err = -110
> Nov 02 10:41:32 razor kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:05:00.0: qmi failed to respond fw mem req:-110
> Nov 02 10:42:58 razor kernel: mhi 0000:05:00.0: Device failed to exit MHI Reset state