linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal: Rearrange thermal_zone_device_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201105113641.fnyugbdbhxovejuj@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:06:41 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: Rearrange thermal_zone_device_set_polling()

On 05-11-20, 12:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/11/2020 10:13, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Rearrange thermal_zone_device_set_polling() to make it more readable and
> > reduce duplicate code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > ---
> 
> Hi Viresh,
> 
> I have a series where this function is reworked and conflicts with your
> changes. The delay is converted into jiffies at init time and no
> conversion happen in this function anymore.
> 
> Do you mind if we discard this patch ?

Discarded :)

-- 
viresh