[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201105134142.GA4856@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 13:41:42 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: Add support for SMCCC TRNG entropy source
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 12:56:55PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> static inline bool __must_check arch_get_random_seed_int(unsigned int *v)
> {
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> unsigned long val;
> - bool ok = arch_get_random_seed_long(&val);
>
> - *v = val;
> - return ok;
> + if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_RNG)) {
> + if (arch_get_random_seed_long(&val)) {
> + *v = val;
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> + }
It isn't obvious to me why we don't fall through to trying the SMCCC
TRNG here if for some reason the v8.5-RNG didn't give us something.
Definitely an obscure possibility but still...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists