[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6873cf12-456b-c121-037b-d2c5a6138cb3@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:22:18 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: Parshuram Thombare <pthombar@...ence.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, <Santiago.Esteban@...rochip.com>,
<andrew@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <harini.katakam@...inx.com>,
<michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: macb: fix NULL dereference due to no pcs_config
method
On 05/11/2020 at 15:37, Parshuram Thombare wrote:
> This patch fixes NULL pointer dereference due to NULL pcs_config
> in pcs_ops.
>
> Fixes: e4e143e26ce8 ("net: macb: add support for high speed interface")
What is this tag? In linux-next? As patch is not yet in Linus' tree, you
cannot refer to it like this.
> Reported-by: Nicolas Ferre <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/11/4/482
You might need to change this to a "lore" link:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2db854c7-9ffb-328a-f346-f68982723d29@microchip.com/
> Signed-off-by: Parshuram Thombare <pthombar@...ence.com>
This fix looks a bit weird to me. What about proposing a patch to
Russell like the chunk that you already identified in function
phylink_major_config()?
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> index b7bc160..130a5af 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> @@ -633,6 +633,15 @@ static void macb_pcs_an_restart(struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
> /* Not supported */
> }
>
> +static int macb_pcs_config(struct phylink_pcs *pcs,
> + unsigned int mode,
> + phy_interface_t interface,
> + const unsigned long *advertising,
> + bool permit_pause_to_mac)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
Russell, is the requirement for this void function intended?
> +
> static const struct phylink_pcs_ops macb_phylink_usx_pcs_ops = {
> .pcs_get_state = macb_usx_pcs_get_state,
> .pcs_config = macb_usx_pcs_config,
> @@ -642,6 +651,7 @@ static const struct phylink_pcs_ops macb_phylink_usx_pcs_ops = {
> static const struct phylink_pcs_ops macb_phylink_pcs_ops = {
> .pcs_get_state = macb_pcs_get_state,
> .pcs_an_restart = macb_pcs_an_restart,
> + .pcs_config = macb_pcs_config,
> };
>
> static void macb_mac_config(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode,
> @@ -776,10 +786,13 @@ static int macb_mac_prepare(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode,
>
> if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER)
> bp->phylink_pcs.ops = &macb_phylink_usx_pcs_ops;
> - else
> + else if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
> bp->phylink_pcs.ops = &macb_phylink_pcs_ops;
Do you confirm that all SGMII type interfaces need phylink_pcs.ops?
> + else
> + bp->phylink_pcs.ops = NULL;
>
> - phylink_set_pcs(bp->phylink, &bp->phylink_pcs);
> + if (bp->phylink_pcs.ops)
> + phylink_set_pcs(bp->phylink, &bp->phylink_pcs);
>
> return 0;
> }
Regards,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists