linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuidle: Remove pointless stub

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <91e5b5ad-12e8-70a3-d476-f1d7ad734bb0@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:31:12 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuidle: Remove pointless stub


Hi Rafael,

On 05/11/2020 15:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

[ ... ]

>> [ ... ]
>>
>>> Applied (this patch alone) as 5.10-rc material with some minor edits
>>> in the changelog, thanks!
>>
>> Does it mean you disagree the other patches? Or are you waiting for more
>> comments?
> 
> Actually, both.
> 
> My primary concern regarding the modularization of cpuidle governors
> is that they really belong to the core kernel.  They access the
> internals thereof and the behavior of the idle loop in general depends
> on what they do.
> 
> OTOH IMV a potential benefit resulting from allowing them to be
> modular is very small, at least from the mainline perspective.
> 
> IOW this case is very similar to the modularization of the schedutil
> cpufreq governor which we decided not to do for similar reasons.

Yes, I recall this discussion.

The purpose is to be more consistent with the governors in the other
frameworks which can be module. But as you mentioned it, the benefit is
small, so I'm fine to drop the series.

Thanks

  -- Daniel

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog