[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJzT_NxggEXpkno+raB2=3=bc7-ZmkR5-hB1dGkoPB_Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:16:52 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Update verification logic for LSM programs
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 3:06 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
>
> The current logic checks if the name of the BTF type passed in
> attach_btf_id starts with "bpf_lsm_", this is not sufficient as it also
> allows attachment to non-LSM hooks like the very function that performs
> this check, i.e. bpf_lsm_verify_prog.
>
> In order to ensure that this verification logic allows attachment to
> only LSM hooks, the LSM_HOOK definitions in lsm_hook_defs.h are used to
> generate a BTF_ID set. Upon verification, the attach_btf_id of the
> program being attached is checked for presence in this set.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
I've added Fixes tag and applied to bpf tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists