linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v40 10/24] mm: Add 'mprotect' hook to struct vm_operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201106220402.GB55146@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:04:02 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, asapek@...gle.com,
        cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com,
        kai.svahn@...el.com, kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com,
        luto@...nel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
        puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        yaozhangx@...gle.com, mikko.ylinen@...el.com,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v40 10/24] mm: Add 'mprotect' hook to struct
 vm_operations_struct

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:37:25PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 06:51:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Both comments make sense to me. I'll refine this patch on Monday and
> 
> And while you're at it, I'd suggest you refine the whole patchset and
> send a full v41 instead:
> 
> - please audit all your Reviewed-by, Acked-by tags as to for what
> versions of the patches they were given. If you've changed those patches
> in the meantime, then all those tags are invalid and need to go.
> 
> - work in all the change requests
> 
> - fix the order of the patches so that each one builds
> 
> so that they can be taken cleanly into tip.
> 
> Thx.

OK, everything else is clear except change requests part I want to
check.

There has been a change request to update callback that made perfect
sense to me. Is there something else that I might have missed? Just
checking.

> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

/Jarkko