linux-kernel - [RFC net-next 01/28] net: split out SIOCDEVPRIVATE handling from dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri,  6 Nov 2020 23:17:16 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC net-next 01/28] net: split out SIOCDEVPRIVATE handling from dev_ioctl

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

SIOCDEVPRIVATE ioctl commands are mainly used in really old
drivers, and they have a number of problems:

- They hide behind the normal .ndo_do_ioctl function that
  is also used for other things in modern drivers, so it's
  hard to spot a driver that actually uses one of these

- Since drivers use a number different calling conventions,
  it is impossible to support compat mode for them in
  a generic way.

- With all drivers using the same 16 commands codes, there
  is no way to introspect the data being passed through
  things like strace.

Add a new net_device_ops callback pointer, to address the
first two of these. Separating them from .ndo_do_ioctl
makes it easy to grep for drivers with a .ndo_siocdevprivate
callback, and the unwieldy name hopefully makes it easier
to spot in code review.

By passing the ifreq structure and the ifr_data pointer
separately, it is no longer necessary to overload these,
and the driver can use either one for a given command.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
 include/linux/netdevice.h |  3 +++
 net/core/dev_ioctl.c      | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index d1b7fb1241b3..93f980e1d69b 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1301,6 +1301,9 @@ struct net_device_ops {
 	int			(*ndo_validate_addr)(struct net_device *dev);
 	int			(*ndo_do_ioctl)(struct net_device *dev,
 					        struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd);
+	int			(*ndo_siocdevprivate)(struct net_device *dev,
+						struct ifreq *ifr,
+						void __user *data, int cmd);
 	int			(*ndo_set_config)(struct net_device *dev,
 					          struct ifmap *map);
 	int			(*ndo_change_mtu)(struct net_device *dev,
diff --git a/net/core/dev_ioctl.c b/net/core/dev_ioctl.c
index 5822737a78f4..58daf41a4a08 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_ioctl.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_ioctl.c
@@ -269,6 +269,23 @@ static int dev_do_ioctl(struct net_device *dev,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int dev_siocdevprivate(struct net_device *dev,
+			      struct ifreq *ifr, unsigned int cmd)
+{
+	const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
+	void __user *data = ifr->ifr_data;
+
+	if (ops->ndo_siocdevprivate) {
+		if (netif_device_present(dev))
+			return ops->ndo_siocdevprivate(dev, ifr, data, cmd);
+		else
+			return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	/* fall back to do_ioctl for drivers not yet converted */
+	return dev_do_ioctl(dev, ifr, cmd);
+}
+
 /*
  *	Perform the SIOCxIFxxx calls, inside rtnl_lock()
  */
@@ -346,9 +363,11 @@ static int dev_ifsioc(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr, unsigned int cmd)
 	 *	Unknown or private ioctl
 	 */
 	default:
-		if ((cmd >= SIOCDEVPRIVATE &&
-		    cmd <= SIOCDEVPRIVATE + 15) ||
-		    cmd == SIOCBONDENSLAVE ||
+		if (cmd >= SIOCDEVPRIVATE &&
+		    cmd <= SIOCDEVPRIVATE + 15)
+			return dev_siocdevprivate(dev, ifr, cmd);
+
+		if (cmd == SIOCBONDENSLAVE ||
 		    cmd == SIOCBONDRELEASE ||
 		    cmd == SIOCBONDSETHWADDR ||
 		    cmd == SIOCBONDSLAVEINFOQUERY ||
-- 
2.27.0