[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1277c2aa85ccc4fca1792b8311ea6af0c99ffc82.1604646059.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:33:22 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
digetx@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: dev_pm_opp_put_regulators() accepts NULL argument
The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra checks. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index 66b3db5efb53..5c049428a6f5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int cpu)
out:
if (priv->have_static_opps)
dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
- if (priv->opp_table)
- dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
return ret;
}
@@ -305,8 +304,7 @@ static void dt_cpufreq_release(void)
dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &priv->freq_table);
if (priv->have_static_opps)
dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
- if (priv->opp_table)
- dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
list_del(&priv->node);
}
--
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
Powered by blists - more mailing lists