[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5c4718c-8468-3492-d4bd-a561c795cc89@st.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:03:37 +0100
From: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
To: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Jun Li <lijun.kernel@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: connector: add power-opmode
optional property to usb-connector
Hi Badhri,
On 11/6/20 4:10 AM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> Hi Rob and Amelie,
>
> With regards to discussions in this thread,
> For https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020093627.256885-2-badhri@google.com,
> I can send in a patch to update the new-source-frs-typec-current property.
> Amelie, If you are already planning to send that I am fine with that as well.
> Let me know !
>
> To summarize the changes for new-source-frs-typec-current would be,
> 1. Rename to frs-new-source-opmode
> 2. Use string values instead of u32 similar to typec-power-opmode.
> Are these correct ?
You can send patches to rename the new-source-frq-typec-current property
into frs-new-source-opmode, and update the tcpm as well. You can use the
typec_find_pwr_opmode(), it will return
enum typec_pwr_opmode {
TYPEC_PWR_MODE_USB,
TYPEC_PWR_MODE_1_5A,
TYPEC_PWR_MODE_3_0A,
TYPEC_PWR_MODE_PD,
};
Then you have to translate it for FRS.
I'll send a new version of my series to document typec-power-opmode and
update stusb160x driver and stm32mp15xx-dkx device tree accordingly.
Thanks,
Amelie
>
> Thanks,
> Badhri
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:55 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 6:24 AM Jun Li <lijun.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com> 于2020年11月5日周四 下午7:36写道:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/4/20 10:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:27:14PM +0100, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/30/20 3:29 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:49 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/29/20 4:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:58:03AM +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Power operation mode may depends on hardware design, so, add the optional
>>>>>>>>>> property power-opmode for usb-c connector to select the power operation
>>>>>>>>>> mode capability.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> .../bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml
>>>>>>>>>> index 728f82db073d..200d19c60fd5 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -93,6 +93,24 @@ properties:
>>>>>>>>>> - device
>>>>>>>>>> - dual
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + power-opmode:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've acked this version:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020093627.256885-2-badhri@google.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> frs is used for Fast Role Swap defined in USB PD spec.
>>>>>>>> I understand it allows to get the same information but I'm wondering why
>>>>>>>> the property name is limited to -frs- in this case. What about a
>>>>>>>> non-power delivery USB-C connector ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've got no idea. The folks that know USB-C and PD details need to get
>>>>>>> together and work all this out. To me, it looks like the same thing...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks but...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The purpose of power-opmode property is to configure the USB-C controllers,
>>>>>> especially the non-PD USB-C controllers to determine the power operation
>>>>>> mode that the Type C connector will support and will advertise through CC
>>>>>> pins when it has no power delivery support, whatever the power role: Sink,
>>>>>> Source or Dual
>>>>>> The management of the property is the same that data-role and power-role
>>>>>> properties, and done by USB Type-C Connector Class.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> new-source-frs-typec-current specifies initial current capability of the new
>>>>>> source when vSafe5V is applied during PD3.0 Fast Role Swap. So here, this
>>>>>> property is not applied at usb-c controller configuration level, but during
>>>>>> PD Fast Role Swap, so when the Sink become the Source.
>>>>>> Moreover, the related driver code says FRS can only be supported by DRP
>>>>>> ports. So new-source-frs-typec-current property, in addition to being
>>>>>> specific to PD, is also dedicated to DRP usb-c controller.
>>>>>> The property is managed by Type-C Port Controller Manager for PD.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it's the same set of possible values, right? So we can align the
>>>>> values at least.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> USB Power Delivery FRS values are defined in
>>>> include/dt-bindings/usb/pd.h
>>>
>>> I think this can be changed if both can be aligned.
>>>
>>>> to fit with drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
>>>> frs_typec_current enum.
>>>>
>>>> USB-C power operation mode values are defined in
>>>> include/linux/usb/typec.h with typec_pwr_opmode enum and matching with
>>>> string values of typec_pwr_opmodes tab.
>>>>
>>>> USB PD requires USB-C.
>>>> USB-C doesn't requires USB PD.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c already used typec_pwr_opmode values.
>>>>
>>>> USB PD specification Table 6-14 Fixed Supply PDO says:
>>>> Fast Role Swap required USB Type-C Current (see also [USB Type-C 2.0]):
>>>> Value | Description
>>>> 00b | Fast Swap not supported (default)
>>>> 01b | Default USB Power
>>>> 10b | 1.5A @ 5V
>>>> 11b | 3.0A @ 5V
>>>
>>> This is the value in PDO of sink, the FRS property value(or after translated)
>>> actually is used to compare with above value.
>>>
>>> So I think both properties can share the same "value", maybe string
>>> like below
>>>
>>> 10 static const char * const typec_pwr_opmodes[] = {
>>> 11 [TYPEC_PWR_MODE_USB] = "default",
>>> 12 [TYPEC_PWR_MODE_1_5A] = "1.5A",
>>> 13 [TYPEC_PWR_MODE_3_0A] = "3.0A",
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note the *see also USB Type-C 2.0*.
>>>>
>>>> USB Type-C specification 4.6.2.1 USB Type-C Current says:
>>>> The USB Type-C connector uses CC pins for configuration including an
>>>> ability for a Source to advertise to its port partner (Sink) the amount
>>>> of current it shall supply:
>>>> • Default is the as-configured for high-power operation current value as
>>>> defined by the USB Specification (500 mA for USB 2.0 ports; 900 mA or
>>>> 1,500 mA for USB 3.2 ports in single-lane or dual-lane operation,
>>>> respectively)
>>>> • 1.5 A
>>>> • 3.0 A
>>>>
>>>>> Can we align the names in some way? power-opmode and frs-source-opmode
>>>>> or ??
>>>
>>> how about typec-power-opmode and frs-new-source-opmode
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I let USB PD specialists answer.
>>>>
>>>> *frs* property fits with USB PD specification, so with USB PD protocol.
>>>> *power-opmode fits with USB Type-C specification, so with USB-C hardware
>>>> support.
>>>>
>>>>> Are these 2 properties mutually exclusive?
>>>
>>> I think yes.
>>
>> This should work to express that:
>>
>> allOf:
>> - not:
>> required:
>> - typec-power-opmode
>> - frs-new-source-opmode
>>
>> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists