[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACYkzJ5yQUywf3bkmh1dmmN3xmK5nED94oHs6cfEGcby=-j-Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:39:34 +0100
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/9] bpf: Add tests for task_local_storage
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 3:14 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:58:26PM +0000, KP Singh wrote:
> > +
> > + ret = copy_file_range(fd_in, NULL, fd_out, NULL, stat.st_size, 0);
>
> centos7 glibc doesn't have it.
>
> /prog_tests/test_local_storage.c:59:8: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘copy_file_range’; did you mean ‘sync_file_range’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 59 | ret = copy_file_range(fd_in, NULL, fd_out, NULL, stat.st_size, 0);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | sync_file_range
> BINARY test_progs
> BINARY test_progs-no_alu32
> ld: test_local_storage.test.o: in function `copy_rm':
> test_local_storage.c:59: undefined reference to `copy_file_range'
>
> Could you use something else or wrap it similar to pidfd_open ?
Sure, I created a wrapper similar to pidfd_open and sent out a v6.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists