[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201106104725.GC2785199@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:47:25 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@...solutions.net>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin Berg <bberg@...hat.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] UCSI race condition resulting in wrong port state
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:10:43AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 04:40:45PM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > From: Benjamin Berg <bberg@...hat.com>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > so, I kept running in an issue where the UCSI port information was saying
> > that power was being delivered (online: 1), while no cable was attached.
> >
> > The core of the problem is that there are scenarios where UCSI change
> > notifications are lost. This happens because querying the changes that
> > happened is done using the GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS command while clearing the
> > bitfield happens from the separate ACK command. Any change in between will
> > be lost.
> >
> > Note that the problem may be almost invisible in the UI as e.g. GNOME will
> > still show the battery as discharging. But some policies like automatic
> > suspend may be applied incorrectly.
> >
> > Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Benjamin Berg (2):
> > usb: typec: ucsi: acpi: Always decode connector change information
> > usb: typec: ucsi: Work around PPM losing change information
>
> Do these need to be backported to stable kernel releases? If so, how
> far back?
Due to the lack of response, I guess they don't need to go to any stable
kernel, so will queue them up for 5.11-rc1.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists