[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201106142738.GX20201@alley>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:27:38 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused
recursion
On Fri 2020-11-06 08:41:31, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:13:17 +0100
> Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>
> > JFYI, the code reading and writing the cache looks good to me.
> >
> > It is still possible that some entries might stay unused (filled
> > with zeroes) but it should be hard to hit in practice. It
> > is good enough from my POV.
>
> You mean the part that was commented?
Yeah, it is the comment problem when nr_records is pushed forward.
> >
> > I do not give Reviewed-by tag just because I somehow do not have power
> > to review the entire patch carefully enough at the moment.
>
> No problem. Thanks for looking at it.
>
> I'm adding a link to this thread, so if someone wants proof you helped out
> on this code, you can have them follow the links ;-)
>
> Anyway, even if I push this to linux-next where I stop rebasing code
> (because of test coverage), I do rebase for adding tags. So if you ever get
> around at looking at this code, I can add that tag later (before the next
> merge window), or if you find something, I could fix it with a new patch and
> give you a Reported-by.
Good to know.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists