linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: mlxbf: I2C_MLXBF should depend on MELLANOX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:58:09 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     Khalil Blaiech <kblaiech@...lanox.com>,
        Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mlxbf: I2C_MLXBF should depend on MELLANOX_PLATFORM

On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 01:19:42PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 02:49:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The Mellanox BlueField I2C controller is only present on Mellanox
> > BlueField SoCs.  Hence add a dependency on MELLANOX_PLATFORM, to prevent
> > asking the user about this driver when configuring a kernel without
> > Mellanox platform support.
> > 
> > Fixes: b5b5b32081cd206b ("i2c: mlxbf: I2C SMBus driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> 
> Usually, I wait for maintainer acks before I apply driver patches. I
> make an exception here to have it sorted out before the merge window.
> 
> Applied to for-next, thanks!

Strange, this one got missing, too. Applied again to for-current!



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)