[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7e78b61-021a-444d-eb36-68ce7aae133e@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:25:23 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: fix compat F2FS_IOC_{MOVE,
GARBAGE_COLLECT}_RANGE
On 2020/11/7 2:03, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 02:53:31PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> +#if defined(__KERNEL__)
>> +struct compat_f2fs_gc_range {
>> + u32 sync;
>> + compat_u64 start;
>> + compat_u64 len;
>> +};
>
> There's no need to use '#if defined(__KERNEL__)' in kernel source files.
>
> Likewise for compat_f2fs_move_range.
Correct.
>
>> +static int f2fs_compat_ioc_gc_range(struct file *file, unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(file_inode(file));
>> + struct compat_f2fs_gc_range __user *urange;
>> + struct f2fs_gc_range range;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>> + return -EIO;
>> + if (!f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready(sbi))
>> + return -ENOSPC;
>
> I still don't understand why this checkpoint-related stuff is getting added
> here, and only to the compat versions of the ioctls. It wasn't in the original
> version. If they are needed then they should be added to __f2fs_ioc_gc_range()
> and __f2fs_ioc_move_range() (preferably by a separate patch) so that they are
If so, cp-related stuff will be checked redundantly in both f2fs_ioctl() and
__f2fs_ioc_xxx() function for native GC_RANGE and MOVE_RANGE ioctls, it's not
needed.
Thanks,
> done for both the native and compat versions of these ioctls.
>
> - Eric
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists