[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nR89xB_J3YVu8zC2MOTzVCDb26r+KofkNLWhYG=in6Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 12:17:47 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: enable -Wfallthrough for clang
On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 8:08 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Partial revert of commit e2079e93f562 ("kbuild: Do not enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough for clang for now")
Wait, it says partial revert because it is one, but doing it this way
does not enable the option back for GCC (and Clang).
Shouldn't it be a full revert?
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists