linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: enable -Wfallthrough for clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 7 Nov 2020 12:17:47 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: enable -Wfallthrough for clang

On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 8:08 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Partial revert of commit e2079e93f562 ("kbuild: Do not enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough for clang for now")

Wait, it says partial revert because it is one, but doing it this way
does not enable the option back for GCC (and Clang).

Shouldn't it be a full revert?

Cheers,
Miguel