[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201107140129.kpfhanzjidvdg662@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 15:01:29 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty/serial: delete break after return
Hello,
the Subject is wrong, it should use a prefix similar to "serial: imx:".
It's a good idea to check previous patches to the same file to pick a
suitable prefix. (E.g. git log --oneline drivers/tty/serial/imx.c)
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:29:23PM -0800, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> Delete break after return, which will never run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> index 1731d9728865..09703079db7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> @@ -320,7 +320,6 @@ static u32 imx_uart_readl(struct imx_port *sport, u32 offset)
> switch (offset) {
> case UCR1:
> return sport->ucr1;
> - break;
> case UCR2:
> /*
> * UCR2_SRST is the only bit in the cached registers that might
> @@ -331,16 +330,12 @@ static u32 imx_uart_readl(struct imx_port *sport, u32 offset)
> if (!(sport->ucr2 & UCR2_SRST))
> sport->ucr2 = readl(sport->port.membase + offset);
> return sport->ucr2;
> - break;
> case UCR3:
> return sport->ucr3;
> - break;
> case UCR4:
> return sport->ucr4;
> - break;
> case UFCR:
> return sport->ufcr;
> - break;
you're the third to send this patch since October 20:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026125142.21105-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020130709.28096-1-trix@redhat.com
My comment for these was:
> this might be subjective, but I like the break being there for clearity.
> So I object to make a patch to remove them. In case I'm outvoted I'd at
> least want empty lines instead.
Zhang Qilong wrote he found the patch opportunity by manual code
inspection, I would have expected that there is a tool that identifies a
break after a return. If you had tool support, please mention the tool
in the commit log (if you really want to keep following the patch's
idea).
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists