lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6b74390-6a80-9aae-17b2-536ffa0d1aae@nvidia.com>
Date:   Sat, 7 Nov 2020 11:16:51 -0800
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/gup_benchmark: GUP_BENCHMARK depends on DEBUG_FS

On 11/7/20 11:05 AM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Hubbard [mailto:jhubbard@...dia.com]
...
>>>    config GUP_BENCHMARK
>>>    	bool "Enable infrastructure for get_user_pages() and related calls
>> benchmarking"
>>> +	depends on DEBUG_FS
>>
>>
>> I think "select DEBUG_FS" is better here. "depends on" has the obnoxious
>> behavior of hiding the choice from you, if the dependencies aren't already met.
>> Whereas what the developer *really* wants is a no-nonsense activation of the
>> choice: "enable GUP_BENCHMARK and the debug fs that it requires".
>>
> 
> To some extent, I agree with you. But I still think here it is better to use "depends on".
> According to
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> 
> 	select should be used with care. select will force
> 	a symbol to a value without visiting the dependencies.
> 	By abusing select you are able to select a symbol FOO even
> 	if FOO depends on BAR that is not set.
> 	In general use select only for non-visible symbols
> 	(no prompts anywhere) and for symbols with no dependencies.
> 	That will limit the usefulness but on the other hand avoid
> 	the illegal configurations all over.
> 
> On the other hand, in kernel there are 78 "depends on DEBUG_FS" and
> only 14 "select DEBUG_FS".
> 

You're not looking at the best statistics. Go look at what *already* selects
DEBUG_FS, and you'll find about 50 items.


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ